<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 of the Best Church Website Designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/</link>
	<description>Web Design and Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Thombre</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-49449</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Thombre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-49449</guid>
		<description>This is a very good compilation , The look and feel of each site is very unique and rich in graphics. This was helpful to take referance for our Church website design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good compilation , The look and feel of each site is very unique and rich in graphics. This was helpful to take referance for our Church website design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Fotopoulos</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-49387</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Fotopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-49387</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re redesigning our web site with a professional team. I&#039;m always interested in what other churches are doing, esp if the sites are considered top-notch. Your list is beneficial, but you give absolutely no indication of the criteria used to determine which site makes the cut and which doesn&#039;t. Does that appear anywhere on your website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re redesigning our web site with a professional team. I&#8217;m always interested in what other churches are doing, esp if the sites are considered top-notch. Your list is beneficial, but you give absolutely no indication of the criteria used to determine which site makes the cut and which doesn&#8217;t. Does that appear anywhere on your website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Arellano</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-48872</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Arellano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-48872</guid>
		<description>ARE you kidding?  90% of these church websites are out of a cookie cutter.  How many use models?  What about the titled, piled up, and/or &quot;jagged photo border&quot; frames?  And the search for that trendy word.   Like XTREME.  Or revolution/ary.  Or vintage.

The only two original sites here are Saint Gregory of Nyssa and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.  How interesting they follow each other.  Also how different they are from each other--what originality gets you. 

Different is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARE you kidding?  90% of these church websites are out of a cookie cutter.  How many use models?  What about the titled, piled up, and/or &#8220;jagged photo border&#8221; frames?  And the search for that trendy word.   Like XTREME.  Or revolution/ary.  Or vintage.</p>
<p>The only two original sites here are Saint Gregory of Nyssa and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.  How interesting they follow each other.  Also how different they are from each other&#8211;what originality gets you. </p>
<p>Different is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centerpoint Church Woodbridge Virginia</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-48592</link>
		<dc:creator>Centerpoint Church Woodbridge Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-48592</guid>
		<description>Thanks you for all the information.  We have been working on our Church website and this really helpds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you for all the information.  We have been working on our Church website and this really helpds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedding Planner Philippines</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-48112</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding Planner Philippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-48112</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re really nice.  I wish some of the Churches where I&#039;m from will make an effort to even try to fix their sites.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re really nice.  I wish some of the Churches where I&#8217;m from will make an effort to even try to fix their sites.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-47112</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-47112</guid>
		<description>http://corecommunity.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://corecommunity.org/" rel="nofollow">http://corecommunity.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gezocht: Webdesigners voor kerken &#124; Marketing in de Kerk</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-46302</link>
		<dc:creator>Gezocht: Webdesigners voor kerken &#124; Marketing in de Kerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-46302</guid>
		<description>[...] Websites leven met vormgeving van hoge kwaliteit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Websites leven met vormgeving van hoge kwaliteit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-45757</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-45757</guid>
		<description>These are good web sites. The structure looks similar. Were they constructed using  Wordpress or some other content management system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are good web sites. The structure looks similar. Were they constructed using  Wordpress or some other content management system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vandelay Website Design</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-45101</link>
		<dc:creator>Vandelay Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-45101</guid>
		<description>Scottyr,
I completely agree with you that content is ultimately more important to a website&#039;s success and usefulness than looking pretty. But a lot of times that is used as an excuse and a reason not to attempt better design. The two aren&#039;t mutually exclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scottyr,<br />
I completely agree with you that content is ultimately more important to a website&#8217;s success and usefulness than looking pretty. But a lot of times that is used as an excuse and a reason not to attempt better design. The two aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottyr</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wordpress/best-church-websites/#comment-45096</link>
		<dc:creator>scottyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/best-church-websites/#comment-45096</guid>
		<description>Hi there... I like all your sites and comments and stuff.  I was doing a search for &quot;great churches&quot; and google type ahead gave me &quot;great church websites&quot;... as an outsider who was looking, seeking, wanting.... I will tell you this... all that is great stuff- designs, colors, all that- great stuff.  I guess the real reason that I did my search was to find great content... I have heard that content is king... simple sites with focus on content will do ultimately much better over time in reference to actual site readers... what would you rather have- &quot;I love your site&quot; or &quot;I loved hearing your message.. glad I visited&quot;?

My three cents
Scotty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there&#8230; I like all your sites and comments and stuff.  I was doing a search for &#8220;great churches&#8221; and google type ahead gave me &#8220;great church websites&#8221;&#8230; as an outsider who was looking, seeking, wanting&#8230;. I will tell you this&#8230; all that is great stuff- designs, colors, all that- great stuff.  I guess the real reason that I did my search was to find great content&#8230; I have heard that content is king&#8230; simple sites with focus on content will do ultimately much better over time in reference to actual site readers&#8230; what would you rather have- &#8220;I love your site&#8221; or &#8220;I loved hearing your message.. glad I visited&#8221;?</p>
<p>My three cents<br />
Scotty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
