<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StumbleUpon vs. Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/</link>
	<description>Web Design and Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:42:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-34876</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-34876</guid>
		<description>I can agree with the majority of people and say that I have had more success with traffic using SU. The visitors from that site tend to stay a little longer on my pages, as well. Interesting post. It&#039;s nice to see the comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can agree with the majority of people and say that I have had more success with traffic using SU. The visitors from that site tend to stay a little longer on my pages, as well. Interesting post. It&#8217;s nice to see the comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow the expert&#8217;s advice and&#8230; hit Digg&#8217;s Frontpage? &#124; Aleyda Solis Blog &#124; Web Enthusiast, Developer and Promoter</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-15478</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow the expert&#8217;s advice and&#8230; hit Digg&#8217;s Frontpage? &#124; Aleyda Solis Blog &#124; Web Enthusiast, Developer and Promoter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-15478</guid>
		<description>[...] you haven&#8217;t maybe  it is time to start also trying with StumbleUpon -that it is said to send better traffic than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you haven&#8217;t maybe  it is time to start also trying with StumbleUpon -that it is said to send better traffic than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steven!

I didn&#039;t know it was that easy :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steven!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know it was that easy <img src='http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vandelay Design</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>Vandelay Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>Pablo,
Here&#039;s how you do it:
- when you are logged in to GA, click on &quot;traffic sources&quot;.
- that will list the sites that have sent traffic to you.
- click on StumbleUpon.
- when the next page comes up you&#039;ll see a dropdown menu that says &quot;referral path&quot;.
- click on that and choose &quot;landing page&quot;.
- Now you will see a list of pages that have received traffic from SU and how many visitors each.

Reverse Funnel,
I haven&#039;t had that problem. I&#039;ve never heard of that.

Karl,
I completely agree. My experience indicates the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo,<br />
Here&#8217;s how you do it:<br />
- when you are logged in to GA, click on &#8220;traffic sources&#8221;.<br />
- that will list the sites that have sent traffic to you.<br />
- click on StumbleUpon.<br />
- when the next page comes up you&#8217;ll see a dropdown menu that says &#8220;referral path&#8221;.<br />
- click on that and choose &#8220;landing page&#8221;.<br />
- Now you will see a list of pages that have received traffic from SU and how many visitors each.</p>
<p>Reverse Funnel,<br />
I haven&#8217;t had that problem. I&#8217;ve never heard of that.</p>
<p>Karl,<br />
I completely agree. My experience indicates the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl M</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>Like some of the other comments, quantity and quality are two very different things.

Overall we&#039;ve seen visitors last much longer on our site when coming form SU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like some of the other comments, quantity and quality are two very different things.</p>
<p>Overall we&#8217;ve seen visitors last much longer on our site when coming form SU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverse Funnel System Review</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverse Funnel System Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have problme with SU? It dont add sites to my favourites, i fill form click add and it goes to blank page..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have problme with SU? It dont add sites to my favourites, i fill form click add and it goes to blank page..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>Yes, I do use GA. The &quot;problem&quot; I have with it is that it has far too many features! LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I do use GA. The &#8220;problem&#8221; I have with it is that it has far too many features! LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vandelay Design</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Vandelay Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Pablo,
Do you use Google Analytics? I can show you how to do it pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo,<br />
Do you use Google Analytics? I can show you how to do it pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. The pattern of referral for my blogs are almost similar to yours, albeit far lower in numbers. However, I have yet to learn how to track the referrals like how you did.

Perhaps, a tutorial post might be in order, Steven? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. The pattern of referral for my blogs are almost similar to yours, albeit far lower in numbers. However, I have yet to learn how to track the referrals like how you did.</p>
<p>Perhaps, a tutorial post might be in order, Steven? <img src='http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/social-media/stumbleupon-vs-digg/#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>Pelf,
What is the URL of your turtle blog? I can also check your main blog for it.

Pearl,
I agree with you. I think the ease of the SU system makes people more likely to use it. Congrats on your recent success! I also saw the post made the front page of delicious today, so it looks like some of that Digg traffic converted into bookmarks. Very nice.

Dustin, 
You&#039;re right, Digg traffic typically isn&#039;t high quality. I&#039;m an SU user, but I rarely use the stumble feature, which as you said throws people to somewhat random pages. Instead, I look at what pages have been thumbed up by some of my friends and I visit what looks interesting. If other people are using the site this way I think it makes the traffic a little bit higher quality.

Tzabela,
I&#039;ve had decent success with DZone, but only 1 of my posts has gotten that much traffic, that&#039;s really good.

Wayne L.,
I&#039;m no expert on how StumbleUpon serves up pages, but it seems like I&#039;m still getting trickles to pages that were originally submitted almost 6 months ago. I guess as long as someone gives it a thumbs up every now and then it will keep sending traffic.

Wayne S.,
Good point. The networking on StumbleUpon has been pretty helpful for me as well. Yes, that is a nice feature to StumbleUpon that just one vote can bring in decent traffic and lead to even more. I don&#039;t think there is any other social site that can make that claim.

Ruchir,
That&#039;s another good point about links. I think you&#039;re exactly right.  

Reverse, 
Yes, Digg is much more all or nothing.

Masked Man,
Very true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelf,<br />
What is the URL of your turtle blog? I can also check your main blog for it.</p>
<p>Pearl,<br />
I agree with you. I think the ease of the SU system makes people more likely to use it. Congrats on your recent success! I also saw the post made the front page of delicious today, so it looks like some of that Digg traffic converted into bookmarks. Very nice.</p>
<p>Dustin,<br />
You&#8217;re right, Digg traffic typically isn&#8217;t high quality. I&#8217;m an SU user, but I rarely use the stumble feature, which as you said throws people to somewhat random pages. Instead, I look at what pages have been thumbed up by some of my friends and I visit what looks interesting. If other people are using the site this way I think it makes the traffic a little bit higher quality.</p>
<p>Tzabela,<br />
I&#8217;ve had decent success with DZone, but only 1 of my posts has gotten that much traffic, that&#8217;s really good.</p>
<p>Wayne L.,<br />
I&#8217;m no expert on how StumbleUpon serves up pages, but it seems like I&#8217;m still getting trickles to pages that were originally submitted almost 6 months ago. I guess as long as someone gives it a thumbs up every now and then it will keep sending traffic.</p>
<p>Wayne S.,<br />
Good point. The networking on StumbleUpon has been pretty helpful for me as well. Yes, that is a nice feature to StumbleUpon that just one vote can bring in decent traffic and lead to even more. I don&#8217;t think there is any other social site that can make that claim.</p>
<p>Ruchir,<br />
That&#8217;s another good point about links. I think you&#8217;re exactly right.  </p>
<p>Reverse,<br />
Yes, Digg is much more all or nothing.</p>
<p>Masked Man,<br />
Very true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
