<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Paid Links a Necessary Search Engine Optimization Evil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/</link>
	<description>Web Design and Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-76769</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-76769</guid>
		<description>Paid links are not a good idea at all, just not worth the risk and theres no need for them anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid links are not a good idea at all, just not worth the risk and theres no need for them anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mcfarlane</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-52049</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mcfarlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-52049</guid>
		<description>I think in Google&#039;s case it is a question of who are we going to target this month to shutdown.

Google has proven time and time out that they are dedicated to making money period. Case in point a few months back when they decided to shut down and ban 15,000 Affiliates.
Some of these affiliates were honest hard working, White hat guys trying to make a honest buck.

Paid links are just part of the game. I don&#039;t condon it as a long term strategy. But, for some it is a quick fix.
Google is far from stupid, If you have shown a pattern of 10 links a month and suddenly out of the blue you have 10,000 links. Be prepared for a not so friendly visit from Google.
It has always been a David &amp; Golaith story concerning link building. Why do link building when you can pay a team in India $2.00 an hour to due one way link building 90 hours a week.
This is fact not fiction.
Know one knows what Google&#039;s flavour of the month will be, only Google and our best guesses.
Check out Dan Thies link liberation course if you really want to learn how to due link building the right way without pissing anyone off.
cheers
Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in Google&#8217;s case it is a question of who are we going to target this month to shutdown.</p>
<p>Google has proven time and time out that they are dedicated to making money period. Case in point a few months back when they decided to shut down and ban 15,000 Affiliates.<br />
Some of these affiliates were honest hard working, White hat guys trying to make a honest buck.</p>
<p>Paid links are just part of the game. I don&#8217;t condon it as a long term strategy. But, for some it is a quick fix.<br />
Google is far from stupid, If you have shown a pattern of 10 links a month and suddenly out of the blue you have 10,000 links. Be prepared for a not so friendly visit from Google.<br />
It has always been a David &amp; Golaith story concerning link building. Why do link building when you can pay a team in India $2.00 an hour to due one way link building 90 hours a week.<br />
This is fact not fiction.<br />
Know one knows what Google&#8217;s flavour of the month will be, only Google and our best guesses.<br />
Check out Dan Thies link liberation course if you really want to learn how to due link building the right way without pissing anyone off.<br />
cheers<br />
Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-47770</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-47770</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really understand it either.

Take article marketing for example. Most article marketing content is paid for (to be written) and then self published.

How is that any different?

Google gets to do what it wants i suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really understand it either.</p>
<p>Take article marketing for example. Most article marketing content is paid for (to be written) and then self published.</p>
<p>How is that any different?</p>
<p>Google gets to do what it wants i suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chotrul Web Design</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-42328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chotrul Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-42328</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting what Mike @ Toronto says ... it certainly seems a faster route to rankings for a new site. And it certainly seems to me in my experience that a lot of big players around here are buying links with impunity.

Not sure I&#039;d agree ethically about the comment which equated paying for PPC and paying for links for SEO .... I think there&#039;s sufficient clarity of intention for these mechanisms that you are only fooling yourself ethically by equating them ....

my 2 cents ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting what Mike @ Toronto says &#8230; it certainly seems a faster route to rankings for a new site. And it certainly seems to me in my experience that a lot of big players around here are buying links with impunity.</p>
<p>Not sure I&#8217;d agree ethically about the comment which equated paying for PPC and paying for links for SEO &#8230;. I think there&#8217;s sufficient clarity of intention for these mechanisms that you are only fooling yourself ethically by equating them &#8230;.</p>
<p>my 2 cents &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Daily Reading - Issue 86 &#171; Internet Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-38313</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Daily Reading - Issue 86 &#171; Internet Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-38313</guid>
		<description>[...] Paid Links &#8212; A Necessary SEO Evil? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paid Links &#8212; A Necessary SEO Evil? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike @ Toronto SEO</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-35610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike @ Toronto SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-35610</guid>
		<description>Well. The artcle really has a lot of sense but...
but why shouldn&#039;t guys pay for being on the top? if some guys are so unfortunate to start their online business this year - it will mean:
1. new domain name (google has special policy to pay less attention to younger domain names)
2. lack of inbound links

what does that mean? only one thing - they should forget about having their site in top ten. is that right? no way! and here is when link building business enters. But instead of writing articles and comments with links to our SEO services as a way of promotion/link building it would be easier to pay per link. And note-  those paid links are from index pages so way better than having links on the inner pages (though Google indexes those also=)...my conclusion - why not....whatever works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. The artcle really has a lot of sense but&#8230;<br />
but why shouldn&#8217;t guys pay for being on the top? if some guys are so unfortunate to start their online business this year &#8211; it will mean:<br />
1. new domain name (google has special policy to pay less attention to younger domain names)<br />
2. lack of inbound links</p>
<p>what does that mean? only one thing &#8211; they should forget about having their site in top ten. is that right? no way! and here is when link building business enters. But instead of writing articles and comments with links to our SEO services as a way of promotion/link building it would be easier to pay per link. And note-  those paid links are from index pages so way better than having links on the inner pages (though Google indexes those also=)&#8230;my conclusion &#8211; why not&#8230;.whatever works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ofek Web Design</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-34828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ofek Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-34828</guid>
		<description>One of the best article regarding SEO. Paid listing  aren’t evil as they have improved my clients PR..choosing paid listing websites is of much importance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best article regarding SEO. Paid listing  aren’t evil as they have improved my clients PR..choosing paid listing websites is of much importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlinesellingdomination</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-32837</link>
		<dc:creator>onlinesellingdomination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-32837</guid>
		<description>David, you expressed in right manner.  This is the best SEO article which I have ever read.  Many are there who do not follow ethics. But not all paid links violate Google&#039;s guidelines. For the purpose of advertising, buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web.  Again this should not be for manipulation of search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you expressed in right manner.  This is the best SEO article which I have ever read.  Many are there who do not follow ethics. But not all paid links violate Google&#8217;s guidelines. For the purpose of advertising, buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web.  Again this should not be for manipulation of search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicky</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-29496</link>
		<dc:creator>nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-29496</guid>
		<description>yes, no need to go for paid links as we have many sites which offer free links but it take some time to approve and for quick approval we can move for paid links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, no need to go for paid links as we have many sites which offer free links but it take some time to approve and for quick approval we can move for paid links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Directory</title>
		<link>http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/seo/paid-links/#comment-24025</link>
		<dc:creator>Directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/?p=320#comment-24025</guid>
		<description>Very informative article, which I found quite useful.  Cheers ,Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article, which I found quite useful.  Cheers ,Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

